Transcript of Concluding Session
It's nearly ten past four. We could have ten or twenty minutes now. My idea for the last hour was to try and sum up things a bit.
It would be nice to socialise and have smaller conversations if there's time for that. People might have things they want to talk to people about in unstructured space.
If we could very quickly do the things I feel responsible for? We could sit for ten minutes and do those and then do whatever you want to?
Would it make sense to have break now and have a chance to think about the three presentations and then come back?
How about if I say the things on my mind and you can go away knowing what they are and you can then come back and address them or not address them.
So, are there things that might not have been resolved but have changed? Is there anyway of bringing this to some I said in my original proposal that an aim would be to work out the next lot of questions, so if anything came to you on that.
Do you want to do more with this? If so, in what way a residency, for example at Height Gate Barn in the summer? The reports I asked for, can you give me something now or are you going to do it later? It would, be great to have some kind of token of the commitment to do something, if you can't do it now. And the question of the website. Should I say that's my job, or is that something people would like to take on? Shall we come back together at five o clock?
[later]
people's structure of showing, have they showed enough? But I think it wasn't that the structure was wrong, it's just like there were certain things that were driving people to show work, maybe it was partly the way people interpreted the idea of the object and breaking that off from their work. So maybe those sessions could have been elongated a little bit and people could have both shown their work and talked about their process there.
The initial plan was that people would have had it would have taken a day and a half if people had had a half hour slot each, which would have been: object into work, and then some discussion time of maybe twenty minutes each. And that was an earlier model. It would have taken a day and a half to do that, leaving a day and a half to come together and make other relationships. And that didn't seem early enough. So we thought 'we'll give everyone less time, but at the end of Day 1 we'd all be in the same place with each other'. There was still two days left. But maybe somehow the idea of critique could've been introduced into that earlier on?
Critique is really tricky too and how you establish trust. But I think that was something I came in while we were still working in the chapel and saw Lucien sitting at the table with four or five people informally talking about the work. And that felt like a really valuable thing and it's hard to figure out how you could
I mean I think it's been very productive and it's easy to make suggestions, but it doesn't mean
It wasn't the political incorrectness, in some sense,
No, but in a way people could see it like that.
Then in the context of all the other things, then it piles up.
Because the group I was in talked about the option of role playing the scenario that you described with the Indian beggars, then moving from Goa, to Singapore isn't that right?
No, we were just thinking about the cargo ships.
Did we not talk about role-playing the conversation that each beggar would have had at the doors they knocked on?
No, that was a brief suggestion about saying things in each other's accents.
That idea was my suggestion.
I wouldn't be able to do that! [laughs]
I just felt so marked as the only American accent. I wanted to learn a British accent.
We were having a lot to drink; you have to remember that.
I was the only one who tried it.
But we used the scenario with the beggar as an episode that might have an impact, so that was good.
As someone pointed out, going for a vodka run at 10pm did say something about our working practices.
Does anyone have any ideas about what they want to do from here, to do with this, if anything?
I'd like to be involved with the workbook and the website.
The workbook?
Yes.
It's an idea; I might be able to get some money from MIRIAD. But that's something that came out of the project that David Chapman has been working on. So one idea I had was to make a booklet, that
In terms of the website, I have some really great students who work as really inexpensive labour. Talented, inexpensive labour of former students who have lots of ideas. Well not that inexpensive.
We certainly have a lot of beautiful photographs that should be used in some way other than on the web. I think I'd imagined it more as I hadn't really thought of it as concrete outcomes like that, I'd thought of outcomes more as people staying in contact and things.
I meant all of those things. Concrete things and staying in contact. Or the idea came up in our group of something on the model of an Artist Residency.
I think an Artist's Residency where the projects were or there was an advanced dialogue, projects were
When you say an artist's residency, do you mean several weeks?
No.
I couldn't conceive of an artist's residency of four days.
Do you mean four days?
Rosalind do you mean it's too short?
A residency is at least a month or two.
It's just in the terminology, it means that something might come out of it, so it's
Well, you could do three weeks.
The suggestion that came up in our group was three weeks. I thought that would be very expensive. Maybe we could approach an organisation that already does that kind of work and have it as an idea that they could take on.
We could do a second conference if you wanted over four days, I mean it's just a matter of terminology.
It's not just a matter of we don't want to revisit things we've done already. Though if we want to then begin to show each other work, critique, find people you might want to work with, do that in a more open way? We've got this far, can we use it to move on - but what are the practicalities of that? it needs to be three weeks maybe, so how do we think about getting the money for that?
Can you clarify the term residency for me? Is that inviting an artist to
There's so many different possibilities, what do you want to try and get out of it?
So different people might want different kinds of residencies, so if two people want to work together
Do people here think they will have three weeks to do that, in the next year?
I think it's always nice when things evolve over a long period. How you organise that is really difficult, like when people meet up for two days then go away and then meet up for a really intense period. But that's not a residency that implies an actual kind of living.
Maybe there's a whole series of different ways things can happen it's about these particular people all meeting again.
It could be The Salford Restoration Office inviting two people from this workshop and another person, you know, coming up with proposal as a format which has it uses within a context in the locality of Greater Manchester but also has a use within the community we have made here, the people sitting here. I misunderstood you Anna when you asked me did 'The Salford Restoration Office plan to work with anthropologists.' I felt put on the spot about that, because it wasn't necessarily in the plan, but as a way to continuing something that's been started it could be.
The other way is thinking about that interim period between now and whatever it is that we do. Whether it's never or quite soon as a period that we work with rather than a period when we reconvene. One thing I've been working with lately is durational responses and durational response structures. So, for example you have an oppressive regime and you set up a parallel structure that exists for the duration, plus one day, of the oppressive regime. And you set it up with whatever you have, chicken wire, whatever, and you set it up there, next to the Whitehouse. What would be most exciting would be if we could think of this not as how to continue this dialogue, but how the next step could be making a commitment to continuing this dialogue in some way with one of the participants. And then seeing what grows out of that. And then committing to a kind of reporting back to each other or something. And seeing what comes out of that in terms of what another structure could be.
Could that be a structure of emailing one other person and cc-ing a third so that person doesn't take part. So it becomes like a third, the threeing
Right. The Threeing Workshop lives on!
I'd just like to show some films at the museum, not making any distinction if it's made by an artist or an anthropologist. I'd just love to show those films as we saw them here, together, some really great works that have some really great ideas and when you see them together they lend each other ideas and I'd love to open that up in some way.
There's a lot more films that we all have access to. It would be nice in a way to have another session where we just show each other films.
Yeah, and I loved people's work and people also brought films that had influenced them. It's nice to see the film that had influenced you and then the work that you made - not as direct response. So I'd take that as a proposal to the Manchester Museum.
This is the sort of model? This is the workbook that ?
I'd be interested in any other things that people have had from workshops about ways of working.
Are there other anthropology events like this going on?
Well I don't know of any.
Or not like this. Times and places where anthropologists meet?
There's the Royal Anthropological Institute film festival happening in Manchester in July. There will be other things.
But not things where people go and stay together and have ...?
I don't know. Does anybody know?
There used to be something that Dick Werbner organised that was always a weekend workshop around a theme.
There's Santa Fe.
See, I have an interest in exploring that a bit more filmically, so I'd like to know while you're all here where I should point myself.
What about the School of American Research ones?
The one that Writing Culture came out of.
They're organised, they are not by invitation. If you want to do something at that you can put together a proposal and you invite some people and you submit a proposal. And if they take it they fly you in from wherever and they do look after you while you're there. And when I've been you share work beforehand and it was actually a seminar on visual anthropology, but it was based on papers we'd written nonetheless in this case, and we'd all read each others work and each one was a discussant for someone else's and then there were a couple of interlocutors and the whole thing
And what time of year was it?
Anytime you want.
That's the thing, these things happen a lot, all the time, so you need to know anthropologists who are doing it.
Ahh, they're just happening at any point?
Exactly, they're just happening at specific points. So we had one in December. You organise your own.
You organise your own conference and submit it to a body who runs it and takes care of it?
So if you know anthropologists you can, there's nothing
Well, I do now!
If you stay in touch and we're doing stuff then we can let you know.
Or we can put together a proposal even.
So you'd like to know about things that are residential particularly?
Or I could take a part in putting together something if somebody wants to do that.
The other thing that is a funding stream is something called the Wenner Grenn foundation that fund - for anthropologists at least - something called 'a symposium'. Which again is something where you invite people where you all see each others work that you're going to talk about beforehand. But you just get to choose a nice place where you'd like to be for four or five days but it is four or five days. It's not two months.
It's not something that I would be able to commit to anyway in terms of months or weeks. Because I was here, I was really involved, and although I wanted to film, I realised that I couldn't do both, and now I would like to be able to
One way to do it is to put together a proposal. Another way is to get people to let you know if they're doing something but these things happen all the time.
I guess that could be an option for the group anyway despite what I'm trying to get out of it.
So it seems like there's lots of ideas and people will do those ideas if and when they want to. It would be nice if people let me know, so that if they felt any of those things had come out of this, I could have an awareness of how this went on into the world and what it became.
I think maybe in a sense the art AND anthropology maybe its too big. Or maybe just because its two terms. The 'and', maybe the conjunction becomes a disjunction. I was thinking maybe if we were to go for a more limited theme. And there are any number of themes that are of interest, and maybe a happy theme that people have talked about already is 'The return of the real' in terms of art and different peoples relationships to the real and what they might mean by the real. And like in a couple of catalogues on the table here, both Rosalind and Paul distinguish themselves from ethnographic filmmakers' relationships to the real and different relationships to ritual and mythology in a certain sense, and for me that would be an incredibly constructive discussion. Different people's aesthetic responses to an engagement with reality and what we might mean by that.
One of the kind of models that maybe you David can say something about, is if you go on a sound conference there are usually one or two sound walks involved which is where the organiser has just said "ok, there's this particular site where we are all going to go to and we are all going to write down our responses or in some way make a response to it", and it's not supposed to be stand alone bit of work but it gives you all a similar experience that you all have to respond to. And that seems like quite a nice model to do on other things as well as sound. The couple of sound walks I've been on, it's a very amazing thing. You don't have to think about which place you're going, it's like ok, we go here, I just want everybody to have this walk in silence, and everyone responds to it in some way.
There are different forms of response or collaboration. You know paradoxically if it could be said that our group's piece had any virtue it was really due to Mary and Jos and Bryony, but definitely not me, and if I had to do a collaborative piece of work, then I can't really. I guess my next piece of work is so far off that I can't imagine collaborating with anybody, but my work will definitely be informed by the work I've seen here and the discussions I've had in ways that I don't even know yet, and there are different ways of feeding off each other I think, and there are so many other people as well who are interested and who aren't here who are engaged, who are invested in similar endeavours and dialogues.
For me it's similar, it's quite soon to talk about specific potentially, yeah, actual collaborations are going to take place but it's I'm in the midst of it at the minute and in the meantime I'm just going to absorb the experience I suppose.
I mean the website thing is a particular issue, it also sounds like that, if it's an ongoing thing - I'm not sure how funding for that works, but if that's an ongoing thing it's also perhaps something that we can at times, that suit us to contribute things to it, or have as a discussion place or put pieces of work up. It would allow all of us to remain in touch outside of individual things. I know from my experience of the Tate Modern project Fieldworks, that that archive that happened three years ago people watch it all the time. So that is a resource and I don't know if the sound from this can be put on the website. That would make it very accessible to a whole range of students and all sorts of people.
The website could obviously be quite a big thing and take a long time to develop.
Again, you could start it small and keep adding.
The university said they'll maintain it to begin with. I don't know how much space that means there is or how they'll maintain it.
Plus, I mean, what structure would we use if one of us wanted to add something to it?
I've used this really interesting thing called Basecamp. I've used it on projects when I've been working with people in different locations, people sign in and there's lots of areas where you can upload files, and you can have a theme so you can upload something you'd found or a word document you've written. It's structured not quite like a website, and you can post up comments but it's a closed group, so we used it as a way to communicate between projects, but it could be a way to see what emerges from something.
That's something you can upload without being a web designer?
Yeah, I can use it.
JvDP It's like a hard disk online.
I suppose if it was a site that was publicly accessible I'd have to load stuff ...
It's a closed group.
It would have to be in addition. I made a commitment to the AHRC that it would be a public website
When you were thinking about how it might look. It's away that you can see what things are emerging so if people are uploading loads of files you have to think about that, or of people are posting comments on a certain area it reveals a shape.
When Cornerhouse did a project with Clegg and Guttmann, we made a forum. I don't know if that works for images or sound or moving image.
I'll send you a link to one of the projects we did.
Reports, stuff to put on the website, whatever you have that you want to be part of this body of work, if you could get it to me somehow?
What's your deadline on that Amanda?
I have to have something out within three months.
You could just start by putting stuff up now.
Does within three weeks seem like a good time?
We could set up a Connectig Art and Anthropology Basecamp and everybody could see it?
As long as we realise so much work isn't exhibitable on a website. It privileges some work above others that may have to be referred to.
I'd been keen on this other stuff we talked about as a group.
An enormous amount of valuable dialogue came out of all three group meetings and even if it wasn't publically accessible, as a way of our processing ... I don't know if you all did as much audio recording?
Ours failed.
We don't know yet, but we think we recorded a lot of audio. If we uploaded it and made it more widely accessible? We had it running a lot I don't think it should be publicly accessible. We were playing a game so people are saying things that are not necessarily their words.
We might hear ourselves being talked about?
It's the work that counts, and if it becomes programmatic or it becomes like an academic inter-discipline that people are colonising and disciplining and getting invested in for it's own sake then I think there's a danger and I really think it's the work that will shape whatever comes out in an important way. And will shape our understanding of what's happening.
My experience of working with the group was at the point when it went beyond, not necessarily the work, but 'are we the same, are we different', it resolved into something much more interesting.
Thank you very much Amanda for having us all and Lesley for all your work, you've really done a terrific job.
And Daniel thank you for every thing you've done.